IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i6p1455-1477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income distribution and the size of the financial sector: a Sraffian analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Panico
  • Antonio Pinto
  • Martín Puchet Anyul

Abstract

This paper explores the existence of links among the recent trends in income distribution, in the turnover of the financial industry and in financial regulation, moving from Sraffa's analyses of money and banking. It presents a linear production model where a banking industry is introduced and argues that changes in the size of the financial industry can change the distributive shares even if the rates of profit and wage remain constant. An increase in the new loans to workers can increase the profit share and reduce the wage share through an increase in effective demand and the level of production. The analysis can support the contention that the process of financial deregulation, with the consequent explosion of the financial system and the rise of systemic risk, is at the basis of the increase in income inequality observed in recent years. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Panico & Antonio Pinto & Martín Puchet Anyul, 2012. "Income distribution and the size of the financial sector: a Sraffian analysis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(6), pages 1455-1477.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:6:p:1455-1477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/ber022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Panico, Carlo & Pinto, Antonio, 2015. "Income distribution and the size of the financial sector," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP15, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    2. Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "A note on financialization from a Classical-Keynesian standpoint," Department of Economics University of Siena 824, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    3. Karsten Kohler & Alexander Guschanski & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2019. "The impact of financialisation on the wage share: a theoretical clarification and empirical test," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 937-974.
    4. Carlo Panico & Antonio Pinto, 2014. "Bassa crescita dell?economia o elevato sviluppo del settore finanziario? Alcune annotazioni sul recente libro di Piketty," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(113), pages 34-60.
    5. Zolea, Riccardo, 2021. "The relation between interest rate and profit rate: the role of bank profitability in an endogenous money framework," MPRA Paper 108973, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Riccardo Zolea, 2021. "La relazione tra saggio di profitto e tasso d'interesse e il ruolo della profittabilita' bancaria. (The relation between the profit rate and the interest rate, and the role of bank profitability)," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 74(294), pages 97-111.
    7. Enrico Sergio Levrero & Giacomo Sbrenna, 2022. "Some Factors Affecting US Capital Profitability over the Last Decades," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 16(2), pages 77-101, December.
    8. Urban Sušnik, 2016. "Janus Ante Portas," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 417-437, September.
    9. Michel Eduardo Betancourt Gómez, 2023. "Income distribution, banks and managers: A linear joint‐production model with financial assets," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 74-93, February.
    10. Óscar Dejuán, 2019. "Kaldor after Sraffa," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Köhler, Karsten & Guschanski, Alexander & Stockhammer, Engelbert, 2015. "How does financialisation affect functional income distribution? A theoretical clarification and empirical assessment," Economics Discussion Papers 2015-5, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    12. Santiago Capraro & Carlo Panico & Ignacio Perrotini & Francesco Purificato, 2012. "Austerit? o politiche coordinate ed espansive? Le difficili scelte delle autorit? europee," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2012(108), pages 81-112.
    13. Di Bucchianico, Stefano, 2019. "The Impact of Financialization on the Rate of Profit: A Discussion," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP36, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    14. Giuseppe Mastromatteo & Giuseppe Mastromatteo, 2016. "Minsky at Basel: A Global Cap to Build an Effective Postcrisis Banking Supervision Framework," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_875, Levy Economics Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:6:p:1455-1477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.