IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i5p1163-1179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a political economy approach to the Convention on Biological Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Valérie Boisvert
  • Franck-Dominique Vivien

Abstract

International conventions are seldom reviewed in the literature devoted to environmental policy instruments. However, coordination is needed at a global level for global environmental problems characterised by scientific controversies, uncertainty, irreversibility, long-term impacts, economic and geopolitical dimensions. The Convention on Biological Diversity is a good illustration in this regard. The rules it promotes are clearly inspired by mainstream economics. It has therefore been celebrated as a textbook example of sound environmental policy. However, its success has been limited so far and its position within the international conservation regime is challenged. We argue that an alternative analytical approach to environmental global policies is needed and that the French theories of conventions and régulation open up promising prospects in this respect. Copyright , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Valérie Boisvert & Franck-Dominique Vivien, 2012. "Towards a political economy approach to the Convention on Biological Diversity," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(5), pages 1163-1179.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:5:p:1163-1179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bes047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:5:p:1163-1179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.