IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v36y2012i2p419-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A suggestion for a new definition of the concept of finance capital using Marx's notion of 'capital as commodity'

Author

Listed:
  • Bülent Hoca

Abstract

Despite the current phase of financialisation, Hilferding's important concept of 'finance capital' is still ambiguous because of the problems of Hilferding's definition of the concept and the criticisms it has been subjected to. Generally these criticisms approach the concept in a too concrete and historically specific manner. Criticisms which claim that the dominance of finance is a transitory phenomenon were proved to be invalid, but this persistent aspect of monopoly capitalism needs to be explained on a theoretical level. On the other hand, the institutional aspect of the concept is still controversial. This article claims that the concept could be defined on a more abstract level by using Marx's notion of 'capital as commodity', and that the relationship that Hilferding's concept establishes between monopolisation and the dominance of finance could be more clearly expressed. Thus a new definition is suggested, and it is shown that this could help overcome the problems of and objections to the concept. Copyright The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Cambridge Political Economy Society. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Bülent Hoca, 2012. "A suggestion for a new definition of the concept of finance capital using Marx's notion of 'capital as commodity'," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(2), pages 419-434.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:419-434
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/ber034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:36:y:2012:i:2:p:419-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.