IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v19y1995i5p667-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labour Market Segmentation and the State: The New Zealand Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Brosnan, Peter
  • Rea, David
  • Wilson, Moira

Abstract

This paper analyzes the role of the state in the historical process of labor market segmentation. The paper utilizes the existing segmentation literature and develops a framework to understand the state's role in segmentation. The New Zealand labor market is then used as an example of the state's role in the process of labor market segmentation. (c) Academic Press Ltd. Copyright 1995 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Brosnan, Peter & Rea, David & Wilson, Moira, 1995. "Labour Market Segmentation and the State: The New Zealand Experience," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(5), pages 667-696, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:19:y:1995:i:5:p:667-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cees Gorter & Jacques Poot, 1999. "The Impact of Labour Market Deregulation: Lessons from the," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 99-001/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Cees Gorter & Jacques Poot, 1998. "The impact of labour market deregulation: lessons from the "Kiwi" and "Polder" models," ERSA conference papers ersa98p481, European Regional Science Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:19:y:1995:i:5:p:667-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.