IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v18y1994i6p607-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Transition to a Market Economy in Poland: Commentary

Author

Listed:
  • Adam, Jan

Abstract

The Polish recession was deep because the applied monetary, fiscal, and incomes policies were too restrictive and the liberalization of trade was excessive, and no consideration was given to the need for an economic growth strategy. The authorities wrongly believed that enterprises would react to macroeconomic policies as corporations do in a market economy because they disregarded the fact that managers lacked the economy as excessively monopolized. In designing the transformation strategy, insufficient consideration was given to the political and social repercussions. The high social cost of transformation undermined the consensus for change to a market economy. (c) 1994 Academic Press, Inc. Copyright 1994 by Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam, Jan, 1994. "The Transition to a Market Economy in Poland: Commentary," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 18(6), pages 607-618, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:18:y:1994:i:6:p:607-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewelina Kochanek, 2021. "Evaluation of Energy Transition Scenarios in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Mirjam Büdenbender & Manuel B. Aalbers, 2019. "How Subordinate Financialization Shapes Urban Development: The Rise and Fall of Warsaw's Służewiec Business District," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 666-684, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:18:y:1994:i:6:p:607-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.