IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v98y2011i1p163-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A unified framework for studying parameter identifiability and estimation in biased sampling designs

Author

Listed:
  • Hua Yun Chen

Abstract

Based on the odds ratio representation of a joint density, we propose a unified framework to study parameter identifiability in biased sampling designs. It is shown that most of these designs encountered in practice can be reformulated within the proposed framework and, as a result, the question of parameter identifiability can be largely clarified. Estimation of the identifiable parameters is considered and traditional results on the equivalence of the prospective and retrospective likelihoods are extended. Information contained in data on certain identifiable parameters is often very limited. Such parameters can be poorly estimated by the likelihood approach with practically attainable sample sizes, which can substantially affect the estimates of parameters of primary interest. A partially penalized likelihood approach is proposed to address this. Simulation results suggest that the proposed approach has good performance. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Hua Yun Chen, 2011. "A unified framework for studying parameter identifiability and estimation in biased sampling designs," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 98(1), pages 163-175.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:98:y:2011:i:1:p:163-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asq059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hua Yun Chen & Daniel E. Rader & Mingyao Li, 2015. "Likelihood Inferences on Semiparametric Odds Ratio Model," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1125-1135, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:98:y:2011:i:1:p:163-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.