IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v89y2002i1p129-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The discrimination power of projection pursuit with different density estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Renaud

Abstract

We explore the properties of projection pursuit discriminant analysis. This discriminant method is very powerful but relies heavily on a univariate density estimate. We show that the procedure based on wavelets maintains the same rate of convergence as with univariate wavelet density estimation. We also show the Bayes risk strong consistency of both the kernel- and wavelet-based methods. Simulated data and real data concerning character recognition show that the method is effective and robust against the curse of dimensionality. The wavelet alternative seems more likely than the kernel counterpart to find an interesting projection. Wavelets are often criticised for giving too wiggly an estimate and for being too localised to give good global properties. In the above context, these potential drawbacks do not weaken the method but the use of wavelets seems to enhance it. A multiple projection generalisation is also considered. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Renaud, 2002. "The discrimination power of projection pursuit with different density estimators," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(1), pages 129-143, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:89:y:2002:i:1:p:129-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:89:y:2002:i:1:p:129-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.