IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v110y2023i3p579-595..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal design of the Barker proposal and other locally balanced Metropolis–Hastings algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Jure Vogrinc
  • Samuel Livingstone
  • Giacomo Zanella

Abstract

SummaryWe study the class of first-order locally balanced Metropolis–Hastings algorithms introduced in Livingstone & Zanella (2022). To choose a specific algorithm within the class, the user must select a balancing functionsatisfyingand a noise distribution for the proposal increment. Popular choices within the class are the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm and the recently introduced Barker proposal. We first establish a general limiting optimal acceptance rate of 57 and scaling of , as the dimensiontends to infinity among all members of the class under mild smoothness assumptions onand when the target distribution for the algorithm is of product form. In particular, we obtain an explicit expression for the asymptotic efficiency of an arbitrary algorithm in the class, as measured by expected squared jumping distance. We then consider how to optimize this expression under various constraints. We derive an optimal choice of noise distribution for the Barker proposal, an optimal choice of balancing function under a Gaussian noise distribution, and an optimal choice of first-order locally balanced algorithm among the entire class, which turns out to depend on the specific target distribution. Numerical simulations confirm our theoretical findings, and in particular, show that a bimodal choice of noise distribution in the Barker proposal gives rise to a practical algorithm that is consistently more efficient than the original Gaussian version.

Suggested Citation

  • Jure Vogrinc & Samuel Livingstone & Giacomo Zanella, 2023. "Optimal design of the Barker proposal and other locally balanced Metropolis–Hastings algorithms," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(3), pages 579-595.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:3:p:579-595.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asac056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:3:p:579-595.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.