IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v110y2023i2p283-299..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On boosting the power of Chatterjee’s rank correlation

Author

Listed:
  • Z Lin
  • F Han

Abstract

SummaryThe ingenious approach of Chatterjee (2021) to estimate a measure of dependence first proposed by Dette et al. (2013) based on simple rank statistics has quickly caught attention. This measure of dependence has the appealing property of being between 0 and 1, and being 0 or 1 if and only if the corresponding pair of random variables is independent or one is a measurable function of the other almost surely. However, more recent studies (Cao & Bickel 2020; Shi et al. 2022b) showed that independence tests based on Chatterjee’s rank correlation are unfortunately rate inefficient against various local alternatives and they call for variants. We answer this call by proposing an improvement to Chatterjee’s rank correlation that still consistently estimates the same dependence measure, but provably achieves near-parametric efficiency in testing against Gaussian rotation alternatives. This is possible by incorporating many right nearest neighbours in constructing the correlation coefficients. We thus overcome the ‘ only one disadvantage’ of Chatterjee’s rank correlation (Chatterjee, 2021, § 7).

Suggested Citation

  • Z Lin & F Han, 2023. "On boosting the power of Chatterjee’s rank correlation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(2), pages 283-299.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:2:p:283-299.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asac048
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yihui He & Fang Han, 2023. "On propensity score matching with a diverging number of matches," Papers 2310.14142, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:110:y:2023:i:2:p:283-299.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.