IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v109y2022i2p457-471..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoothed nested testing on directed acyclic graphs
[Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs]

Author

Listed:
  • J H Loper
  • L Lei
  • W Fithian
  • W Tansey

Abstract

SummaryWe consider the problem of multiple hypothesis testing when there is a logical nested structure to the hypotheses. When one hypothesis is nested inside another, the outer hypothesis must be false if the inner hypothesis is false. We model the nested structure as a directed acyclic graph, including chain and tree graphs as special cases. Each node in the graph is a hypothesis and rejecting a node requires also rejecting all of its ancestors. We propose a general framework for adjusting node-level test statistics using the known logical constraints. Within this framework, we study a smoothing procedure that combines each node with all of its descendants to form a more powerful statistic. We prove that a broad class of smoothing strategies can be used with existing selection procedures to control the familywise error rate, false discovery exceedance rate, or false discovery rate, so long as the original test statistics are independent under the null. When the null statistics are not independent, but are derived from positively correlated normal observations, we prove control for all three error rates when the smoothing method is an arithmetic averaging of the observations. Simulations and an application to a real biology dataset demonstrate that smoothing leads to substantial power gains.

Suggested Citation

  • J H Loper & L Lei & W Fithian & W Tansey, 2022. "Smoothed nested testing on directed acyclic graphs [Controlling the false discovery rate via knockoffs]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(2), pages 457-471.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:109:y:2022:i:2:p:457-471.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/asab041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:109:y:2022:i:2:p:457-471.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.