IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v100y2013i4p831-842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-sample rank tests under complex sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Lumley
  • Alastair J. Scott

Abstract

Rank tests are widely used for exploratory and formal inference in the health and social sciences. With the widespread use of data from complex survey samples in medical and social research, there is increasing demand for versions of rank tests that account for the sampling design. We propose a general approach to constructing design-based rank tests when comparing groups within a complex sample and when using a national survey as a reference distribution, and illustrate both scenarios with examples. We show that the tests have asymptotically correct levels and that the relative power of different rank tests is not greatly affected by complex sampling. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Lumley & Alastair J. Scott, 2013. "Two-sample rank tests under complex sampling," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(4), pages 831-842.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:4:p:831-842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/ast027
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:4:p:831-842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.