IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v100y2013i4p1019-1023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood ratio tests with boundary constraints using data-dependent degrees of freedom

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Susko

Abstract

When the null hypothesis constrains parameters to the boundary of the parameter space, the asymptotic null distribution of the likelihood ratio statistic is often a mixture of chi-squared distributions, giving rise to the so-called chi-bar test, where weights can depend on the true unknown parameter and be difficult to calculate. We consider the test that conditions on the observed number of null hypothesis parameters in the interior of the parameter space. This approach uses simple chi-squared thresholds, yields conservative asymptotic Type I error, and is guaranteed to give power improvements over the naive approach of simply ignoring boundary constraints. Simulations validate the theoretical results, illustrate application settings, and find power comparable with but usually less than that of the chi-bar test. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Susko, 2013. "Likelihood ratio tests with boundary constraints using data-dependent degrees of freedom," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(4), pages 1019-1023.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:4:p:1019-1023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/ast032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuhao Deng & Chong You & Yukun Liu & Jing Qin & Xiao‐Hua Zhou, 2021. "Estimation of incubation period and generation time based on observed length‐biased epidemic cohort with censoring for COVID‐19 outbreak in China," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 929-941, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:4:p:1019-1023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.