IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v100y2013i3p764-770.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Survival analysis without survival data: connecting length-biased and case-control data

Author

Listed:
  • Kwun Chuen Gary Chan

Abstract

We show that relative mean survival parameters of a semiparametric log-linear model can be estimated using covariate data from an incident sample and a prevalent sample, even when there is no prospective follow-up to collect any survival data. Estimation is based on an induced semiparametric density ratio model for covariates from the two samples, and it shares the same structure as for a logistic regression model for case-control data. Likelihood inference coincides with well-established methods for case-control data. We show two further related results. First, estimation of interaction parameters in a survival model can be performed using covariate information only from a prevalent sample, analogous to a case-only analysis. Furthermore, propensity score and conditional exposure effect parameters on survival can be estimated using only covariate data collected from incident and prevalent samples. Copyright 2013, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwun Chuen Gary Chan, 2013. "Survival analysis without survival data: connecting length-biased and case-control data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 100(3), pages 764-770.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:3:p:764-770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/biomet/ast008
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shih‐Wei Chen & Chin‐Tsang Chiang, 2018. "General single‐index survival regression models for incident and prevalent covariate data and prevalent data without follow‐up," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 881-890, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:100:y:2013:i:3:p:764-770. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.