IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p77-86..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments
[Color contrast and stability as key elements for effective warning signals]

Author

Listed:
  • Ossi Nokelainen
  • Francisko de Moraes Rezende
  • Janne K Valkonen
  • Johanna Mappes

Abstract

A big question in behavioral ecology is what drives diversity of color signals. One possible explanation is that environmental conditions, such as light environment, may alter visual signaling of prey, which could affect predator decision-making. Here, we tested the context-dependent predator selection on prey coloration. In the first experiment, we tested detectability of artificial visual stimuli to blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) by manipulating stimulus luminance and chromatic context of the background. We expected the presence of the chromatic context to facilitate faster target detection. As expected, blue tits found targets on chromatic yellow background faster than on achromatic grey background whereas in the latter, targets were found with smaller contrast differences to the background. In the second experiment, we tested the effect of two light environments on the survival of aposematic, color polymorphic wood tiger moth (Arctia plantaginis). As luminance contrast should be more detectable than chromatic contrast in low light intensities, we expected birds, if they find the moths aversive, to avoid the white morph which is more conspicuous than the yellow morph in low light (and vice versa in bright light). Alternatively, birds may attack first moths that are more detectable. We found birds to attack yellow moths first in low light conditions, whereas white moths were attacked first more frequently in bright light conditions. Our results show that light environments affect predator foraging decisions, which may facilitate context-dependent selection on visual signals and diversity of prey phenotypes in the wild.

Suggested Citation

  • Ossi Nokelainen & Francisko de Moraes Rezende & Janne K Valkonen & Johanna Mappes, 2022. "Context-dependent coloration of prey and predator decision making in contrasting light environments [Color contrast and stability as key elements for effective warning signals]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 77-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:77-86.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleanor M. Caves & Patrick A. Green & Matthew N. Zipple & Susan Peters & Sönke Johnsen & Stephen Nowicki, 2018. "Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird," Nature, Nature, vol. 560(7718), pages 365-367, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:77-86.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.