IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v33y2022i1p245-251..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MHC-II distance between parents predicts sex allocation decisions in a genetically monogamous bird
[The effect of parental and maternal-fetal histocompatibility at MHC on sex ratio in offspring]

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Pineaux
  • Thomas Merkling
  • Etienne Danchin
  • Scott A Hatch
  • Sarah Leclaire
  • Pierrick Blanchard

Abstract

Theory predicts that parental heritable characteristics should shape sex allocation decisions when their effects on reproduction or survival are offspring sex-dependent. Numerous studies have questioned to what extent characteristics displayed by one of the parents matched theoretical expectations. This contrasts with the handful of studies that investigated whether compatibility between parents could also trigger selective pressures for sex allocation adjustments. We studied the genetically monogamous black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla), where previous data revealed that female chicks suffered higher fitness costs from low diversity at genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) than male chicks. We predicted, and found in our dataset, that MHC-similar parents, producing low MHC-diverse offspring, should avoid the production of females. The relation between MHC-distance between parents (i.e. the functional distinctness of their MHC alleles) and offspring sex was not linear, such that MHC-dissimilar parents also overproduced sons. Overall, our results suggest that the genetically monogamous black-legged kittiwake parents flexibly adapt their reproduction and circumvent the costs of suboptimal pairing by manipulating offspring sex.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Pineaux & Thomas Merkling & Etienne Danchin & Scott A Hatch & Sarah Leclaire & Pierrick Blanchard, 2022. "MHC-II distance between parents predicts sex allocation decisions in a genetically monogamous bird [The effect of parental and maternal-fetal histocompatibility at MHC on sex ratio in offspring]," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 245-251.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:245-251.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arab130
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:245-251.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.