IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v30y2019i3p843-851..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natal habitat and sex-specific survival rates result in a male-biased adult sex ratio

Author

Listed:
  • A H Jelle Loonstra
  • Mo A Verhoeven
  • Nathan R Senner
  • Jos C E W Hooijmeijer
  • Theunis Piersma
  • Rosemarie Kentie

Abstract

The adult sex ratio (ASR) is a crucial component of the ecological and evolutionary forces shaping the dynamics of a population. Although in many declining populations ASRs have been reported to be skewed, empirical studies exploring the demographic factors shaping ASRs are still rare. In this study of the socially monogamous and sexually dimorphic Black-tailed Godwit (Limosa limosa limosa), we aim to evaluate the sex ratio of chicks at hatch and the subsequent sex-specific survival differences occurring over 3 subsequent life stages. We found that, at hatch, the sex ratio did not deviate from parity. However, the survival of pre-fledged females was 15–30% lower than that of males and the sex bias in survival was higher in low-quality habitat. Additionally, survival of adult females was almost 5% lower than that of adult males. Because survival rates of males and females did not differ during other life-history stages, the ASR in the population was biased toward males. Because females are larger than males, food limitations during development or sex-specific differences in the duration of development may explain the lower survival of female chicks. Differences among adults are less obvious and suggest previously unknown sex-related selection pressures. Irrespective of the underlying causes, by reducing the available number of females in this socially monogamous species, a male-biased ASR is likely to contribute to the ongoing decline of the Dutch godwit population.

Suggested Citation

  • A H Jelle Loonstra & Mo A Verhoeven & Nathan R Senner & Jos C E W Hooijmeijer & Theunis Piersma & Rosemarie Kentie, 2019. "Natal habitat and sex-specific survival rates result in a male-biased adult sex ratio," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(3), pages 843-851.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:3:p:843-851.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arz021
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:30:y:2019:i:3:p:843-851.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.