IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v29y2018i4p885-893..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistically testing the role of individual learning and decision-making in trapline foraging

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn A Ayers
  • Paul R Armsworth
  • Berry J Brosi

Abstract

In a strategy known as traplining, foragers including bees, bats, and hummingbirds visit replenishing food sources in repeated patterns to decrease travel times. Few null models exist to test the statistical significance of traplines driven by memory and learning as opposed to patterns emerging from resource layouts and random movements. Our method, which tests empirical data against the behavior of computer simulated foragers, is a powerful tool for testing hypotheses related to inherently spatial processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn A Ayers & Paul R Armsworth & Berry J Brosi, 2018. "Statistically testing the role of individual learning and decision-making in trapline foraging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(4), pages 885-893.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:4:p:885-893.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ary058
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abroskin A.S. (Аброскин, А.С.) & Abroskina N.A. (Аброскина, Н.А.), 2016. "Shadow Cross-Border Capital Flows: Contemporary Concepts, Principles and Information Base of Accounting and Measurement [Теневые Трансграничные Потоки Капитала: Современные Концепции, Принципы И Ин," Working Papers 2135, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:29:y:2018:i:4:p:885-893.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.