IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v26y2015i2p593-600..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why fledge early in the day? Examining the role of predation risk in explaining fledging behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Scott J. Chiavacci
  • Michael P. Ward
  • Thomas J. Benson

Abstract

Predation represents the primary cause of mortality for both nestling and fledgling birds and is often greatest in the days immediately before and after nest departure. Due to the selective pressures of such high mortality rates, behaviors likely evolved to increase the survival of young. Among altricial species, fledging often occurs in the morning with most nestlings leaving within 6h of sunrise. However, why nestlings tend to fledge in the morning and whether this strategy is a response to predation risk is unknown. We investigated how the time of day when fledging began and how rapidly broodmates fledged were influenced by nest predation rates and nest site features that affect nest predation risk. We video recorded 477 fledging events at 202 nests of 17 species. Nestlings occupying nests with greater predation risk initiated fledging earlier in the day than those at safer nests. Similarly, broodmates in riskier nests fledged over a shorter period of time than broodmates in safer nests. Our findings support the hypothesis that predation risk influences the time of day when fledging occurs. By fledging earlier and more quickly, young in high risk nests presumably decrease their chances of being depredated in the nest, whereas those occupying safer nests are likely under reduced pressure to fledge as early and quickly as possible. These results indicate that nestlings preparing to fledge likely face more complex situations than currently understood, and the timing of nest departure is an important decision made in an effort to maximize fledgling fitness.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott J. Chiavacci & Michael P. Ward & Thomas J. Benson, 2015. "Why fledge early in the day? Examining the role of predation risk in explaining fledging behavior," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 593-600.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:593-600.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru236
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susana I. Peluc & T. Scott Sillett & John T. Rotenberry & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2008. "Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in an island songbird exposed to a novel predation risk," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(4), pages 830-835.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Isaac Gravolin & Topi K Lehtonen & Nicholas D S Deal & Ulrika Candolin & Bob B M Wong, 2021. "Male reproductive adjustments to an introduced nest predator," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1163-1170.
    2. Ringelman, Kevin M., 2014. "Predator foraging behavior and patterns of avian nest success: What can we learn from an agent-based model?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 141-149.
    3. Helen R. Sofaer & T. Scott Sillett & Susana I. Peluc & Scott A. Morrison & Cameron K. Ghalambor, 2013. "Differential effects of food availability and nest predation risk on avian reproductive strategies," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(3), pages 698-707.
    4. Ariane Mutzel & Anne-Lise Olsen & Kimberley J Mathot & Yimen G Araya-Ajoy & Marion Nicolaus & Jan J Wijmenga & Jonathan Wright & Bart Kempenaers & Niels J Dingemanse, 2019. "Effects of manipulated levels of predation threat on parental provisioning and nestling begging," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 30(4), pages 1123-1135.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:26:y:2015:i:2:p:593-600.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.