IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v24y2013i2p435-443..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Primary and secondary sex ratios in a gregarious parasitoid with local mate competition

Author

Listed:
  • Sahand K. Khidr
  • Sean Mayes
  • Ian C.W. Hardy

Abstract

Sex allocation is one of the most productive domains of behavioral ecology and has led to a sophisticated understanding of factors influencing an organism’s reproductive decisions. The production of strongly female-biased sex ratios, with low between group variance, is selected for when single mothers produce groups of sibmating progeny. Although the sex of progeny is determined at oviposition (primary sex ratio), the selective value of given sexual compositions is often only apparent when offspring mature and mate (secondary sex ratio). As developmental mortality can alter the sexual composition of given offspring groups, its occurrence can select for mothers to adjust their (primary) sex allocation strategies as insurance against female-only secondary sex ratios. Empirical assessment of primary sex ratios is problematic when male and female eggs are indistinguishable. Here, we apply DNA microsatellite markers to evaluate primary sex ratios in the gregarious parasitoid Goniozus legneri Gordh (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and compare these with secondary sex ratios. We find that sexually differential mortality is absent or weak, but mortality acts to increase sex ratio variance and to obscure initially present relationships between sex ratio and group size. In some groups of offspring, there is a tendency for males and females to be laid in spatial separation. Our direct assessments of the sex of eggs avoid widespread problems inherent in utilizing subsets of matured offspring groups with no mortality as representative of overall primary sex ratios but, in this instance, it also confirms interpretations made by studies constrained to employ methods that are strictly incorrect.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahand K. Khidr & Sean Mayes & Ian C.W. Hardy, 2013. "Primary and secondary sex ratios in a gregarious parasitoid with local mate competition," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(2), pages 435-443.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:435-443.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ars181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tom Bentley & Tristan T. Hull & Ian C.W. Hardy & Marlène Goubault, 2009. "The elusive paradox: owner--intruder roles, strategies, and outcomes in parasitoid contests," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 296-304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rihab Mohamad & Jean-Paul Monge & Marlène Goubault, 2012. "Wait or fight? Ownership asymmetry affects contest behaviors in a parasitoid wasp," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(6), pages 1330-1337.
    2. Mike Mesterton-Gibbons & Tugba Karabiyik & Tom Sherratt, 2014. "The Iterated Hawk–Dove Game Revisited: The Effect of Ownership Uncertainty on Bourgeois as a Pure Convention," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 407-431, December.
    3. Mike Mesterton-Gibbons & Tugba Karabiyik & Tom N. Sherratt, 2016. "On the Evolution of Partial Respect for Ownership," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 359-395, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:24:y:2013:i:2:p:435-443.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.