IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v23y2012i1p112-124..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans

Author

Listed:
  • Robert I. Bowers
  • Skyler S. Place
  • Peter M. Todd
  • Lars Penke
  • Jens B. Asendorpf

Abstract

There is much evidence that humans, as other species, are affected by social information when making mate-choice decisions. Witnessing a rival show interest in a member of the opposite sex tends to lead human observers of both sexes to thereafter rate that person as more appealing as a potential mate. However, how this occurs is not well understood. We investigate whether this effect is specific to the individual witnessed or will generalize to other potential mates with shared characteristics—that is, whether humans exhibit trait-based or just individual-based mate-choice copying. We found that whereas this kind of generalization did occur with some traits, it appeared to depend on age, and conspicuously, it did not occur with (inner) facial traits. We discuss possible explanations for the age specificity and cue specificity in terms of informational benefits and how people attend to unfamiliar faces.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert I. Bowers & Skyler S. Place & Peter M. Todd & Lars Penke & Jens B. Asendorpf, 2012. "Generalization in mate-choice copying in humans," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 112-124.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:112-124.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr164
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabelle Coolen & Ashley J.W. Ward & Paul J.B. Hart & Kevin N. Laland, 2005. "Foraging nine-spined sticklebacks prefer to rely on public information over simpler social cues," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(5), pages 865-870, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sushil Bikhchandani & David Hirshleifer & Omer Tamuz & Ivo Welch, 2021. "Information Cascades and Social Learning," Papers 2105.11044, arXiv.org.
    2. Nina Kniel & Clarissa Dürler & Ines Hecht & Veronika Heinbach & Lilia Zimmermann & Klaudia Witte, 2015. "Novel mate preference through mate-choice copying in zebra finches: sexes differ," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(2), pages 647-655.
    3. Sabine Nöbel & Etienne Danchin & Guillaume Isabel, 2018. "Mate-copying for a costly variant in Drosophila melanogaster females," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(5), pages 1150-1156.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:23:y:2012:i:1:p:112-124.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.