Costly help of audiovisual bimodality for female mate choice in a nocturnal anuran (Hyla arborea)
AbstractIn nocturnal anurans, females often have to choose a mate in a sensory-challenging situation--noisy background and high density of potential mates. Multimodality can help female choice by improving mate choice accuracy or reducing time to choose. Here, we conducted 2 choice experiments in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) to test this question in 2 sensory conditions of large or reduced difference between potential targets, the latter being a discrimination challenge for females. We examined female choice (target, time to choose) in 3 conditions: unimodal conditions with varying acoustic signals, multimodal conditions with nondiscriminating acoustic signals and varying visual signals, and multimodal conditions with varying both acoustic and visual signals. We find that females are less accurate and take more time to choose when targets are more similar. The use of 2 varying sensory modalities reduces latency to choose when targets largely differ. It improves mate choice accuracy when targets are more similar. This improvement is associated to a longer time to choose, suggesting a speed--accuracy trade-off, which is shown for the first time in a mate choice context. We also find that the presence of nondiscriminating acoustic cues is not helpful for mate choice. Finally, we show that females choose the high-quality stimulus more quickly and suggest that this temporal gain may be reinforced when targets are more similar. We discuss our results in relation to female sampling tactics and to the benefits and costs of multimodality. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by International Society for Behavioral Ecology in its journal Behavioral Ecology.
Volume (Year): 22 (2011)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Web page: http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Oxford University Press) or (Christopher F. Baum).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.