IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v22y2011i4p808-818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The red deer rut revisited: female excursions but no evidence females move to mate with preferred males

Author

Listed:
  • Katie V. Stopher
  • Daniel H. Nussey
  • Tim H. Clutton-Brock
  • Fiona Guinness
  • Alison Morris
  • Josephine M. Pemberton

Abstract

In polygynous mammals, most variance in male reproductive success is expected to result from competition between males, and the role of female behavior remains poorly understood. Contests between red deer males during the annual rut are one of the most famous examples of male--male competition. However, anecdotal evidence suggests females in estrus make substantial movements, changing harems, and potentially disrupting the outcome of male contests. In other polygynous mammals, such movements have been interpreted as evidence of female mating preferences. Here, we use 34 years of detailed observational data on wild red deer to show that 43% of estrous females are found in different harems between successive observations and that 64% of such females make substantial movements (up to 4 km) when this occurs. Approximately 45% of these movements result in the male into whose harem a female moved fathering her offspring. We then test whether females move nonrandomly with respect to male phenotype, consistent with the hypothesis that females move to mate with preferred males. Although in general, females were more likely to be found in larger harems and the harems of younger males after harem changes, these effects were not specific to estrous females. Further, estrous females were not more likely to be found in the harems of less related males. We therefore find little support for the idea that estrous females move between harems to mate with a preferred male; as a result, the reasons females make such extraordinary movements when in estrus remain unclear. Copyright 2011, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie V. Stopher & Daniel H. Nussey & Tim H. Clutton-Brock & Fiona Guinness & Alison Morris & Josephine M. Pemberton, 2011. "The red deer rut revisited: female excursions but no evidence females move to mate with preferred males," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(4), pages 808-818.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:808-818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arr052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:22:y:2011:i:4:p:808-818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.