IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i6p1330-1336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative genetic variation in courtship song and its covariation with immune function and sperm quality in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus

Author

Listed:
  • Leigh W. Simmons
  • Robin M. Tinghitella
  • Marlene Zuk

Abstract

Acoustic signals used by males to attract females are among the most prominent examples of secondary sexual traits, yet we have only limited understanding of their genetic architecture. Male crickets produce a calling song to attract females and then switch to a courtship song that incites mounting by females once they are at close range. Although we know much about the genetics of cricket calling song, no study has yet examined the quantitative genetics of courtship song. Here, we conduct a quantitative genetic analysis of courtship song using the Australian cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. We find substantial levels of additive genetic variation in courtship song parameters and genetic covariances between courtship song parameters that reflect female preferences. We also found evidence for a negative relationship between the amount of trill in the courtship song and the ability of males to mount an immune response and to produce an ejaculate containing a high proportion of viable sperm. Trade-offs between immunity and sexual signaling are a prerequisite for immunocompetence handicap models of preference evolution, whereas a trade-off between gaining matings and fertilizations is a fundamental assumption underlying sperm competition theory. These life-history trade-offs are likely to constrain evolutionary responses to selection from female choice, and to maintain additive genetic variance in courtship song. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Leigh W. Simmons & Robin M. Tinghitella & Marlene Zuk, 2010. "Quantitative genetic variation in courtship song and its covariation with immune function and sperm quality in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(6), pages 1330-1336.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1330-1336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq154
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leigh W. Simmons, 2012. "Resource allocation trade-off between sperm quality and immunity in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(1), pages 168-173.
    2. Malika Ihle & Bart Kempenaers & Wolfgang Forstmeier, 2013. "Does hatching failure breed infidelity?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 119-127.
    3. Nicola-Anne J Rutkowski & Yong Zhi Foo & Therésa M Jones & Kathryn B McNamara, 2023. "Age, but not an immune challenge, triggers terminal investment in the Pacific field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 468-479.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:6:p:1330-1336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.