IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i5p1061-1066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digit length ratio (2D:4D) and variation in key life-history traits and fitness in contemporary Finnish women

Author

Listed:
  • Samuli Helle

Abstract

The ratio of second-to-fourth digit length (2D:4D) has been suggested to reflect prenatal steroid levels, which likely bear important consequences for vertebrate adult-age physiology, behavior, and reproductive success. The evidence for 2D:4D being related to individual fitness comes largely from studies in humans. These studies have not, however, been conclusive as important confounding factors affecting completed family size (e.g., socioeconomic status) have not been accounted for and the vast majority of the participants examined have not yet ended their reproductive careers. In addition, the life-history traits generating such fitness differences have received less attention in the literature. We studied whether 2D:4D was associated with several life-history traits (probability of reproducing, adulthood height, ages at first and last reproduction, and interbirth intervals) and fitness (the number of offspring raised to adulthood) in postreproductive Finnish women, while controlling for education and spatio-temporal variation of traits. We found no association between 2D:4D and the life-history traits studied and fitness among these Finnish women. These results thus cast doubts to the claim that 2D:4D predicts female life histories and evolutionary fitness in humans. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuli Helle, 2010. "Digit length ratio (2D:4D) and variation in key life-history traits and fitness in contemporary Finnish women," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(5), pages 1061-1066.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1061-1066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:5:p:1061-1066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.