IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2010i3p485-492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A pigheaded compromise: do competition and predation explain variation in warthog group size?

Author

Listed:
  • Angela M. White

Abstract

The reproductive payoff to an individual for participating in a group will often be affected by the size of the group. Competition for resources and predation pressure are 2 primary factors that influence sociality and group size in a variety of species. In this correlative study, I investigated how resource competition and predation influenced group size and female reproduction in the common warthog, Phacochoerus africanus. The distribution of group sizes indicated that group size depended on the age and sex of the participants. Yearlings formed larger groups than adults, whereas adult males and adult females formed similar sized groups, although males were more likely to be solitary. The demand for preferred habitat, clan density, predation pressure, and the time of year explained significant variation in the size of adult female groups but not in the size of adult male or yearling groups. Clan areas with more warthogs per area of preferred habitat were associated with smaller adult female groups, whereas higher densities of warthogs were associated with larger group sizes. Increasing indication of predator presence in a clan area had little influence on grouping behavior in general but resulted in larger female group sizes late in the dry season and with increased sightings of females with juveniles. The relationship between group size and predation pressure may be a consequence of group stability and higher mortality in larger groups. Copyright 2010, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela M. White, 2010. "A pigheaded compromise: do competition and predation explain variation in warthog group size?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(3), pages 485-492.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:485-492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arq009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2010:i:3:p:485-492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.