IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v21y2009i1p33-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Context-dependent fitness effects of behavioral manipulation by a parasitoid

Author

Listed:
  • Arne Janssen
  • Amir H. Grosman
  • Eduardo G. Cordeiro
  • Elaine F. de Brito
  • Juliana Oliveira Fonseca
  • Felipe Colares
  • Angelo Pallini
  • Eraldo R. Lima
  • Maurice W. Sabelis

Abstract

Many true parasites and parasitoids modify the behavior of their host, and most of these changes are thought to benefit the parasites. However, field tests of this hypothesis are scarce. We previously showed that braconid parasitoids (Glyptapanteles sp.) induce their caterpillar host (Thyrinteina leucocerae) to behave as a bodyguard of the parasitoid's pupae; they stand bent over the pupae and violently lash out at predators approaching them, resulting in reduced predation of parasitoid pupae on guava trees in the field. In contrast, we show here that this behavioral manipulation does not result in increased parasitoid survival on eucalyptus trees, an introduced host plant species. Hence, the effects of behavioral manipulation of the host depend on the ecological context. We hypothesize that this is due to a different species composition of the community of predators and hyperparasitoids on the 2 host plant species. Our results show that fitness effects of behavioral manipulation should be evaluated in a setting that includes all relevant components of the natural food web. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Arne Janssen & Amir H. Grosman & Eduardo G. Cordeiro & Elaine F. de Brito & Juliana Oliveira Fonseca & Felipe Colares & Angelo Pallini & Eraldo R. Lima & Maurice W. Sabelis, 2009. "Context-dependent fitness effects of behavioral manipulation by a parasitoid," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(1), pages 33-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:33-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp153
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:21:y:2009:i:1:p:33-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.