IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i6p1295-1298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sophisticated early life lessons: threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by embryonic amphibians

Author

Listed:
  • Maud C.O. Ferrari
  • Douglas P. Chivers

Abstract

The ability to develop effective antipredator responses early in life should be strongly promoted by natural selection. Recent work has shown that embryonic amphibians can learn to recognize predators even before they hatch. Here, we showed that embryonic woodfrogs, Rana sylvatica, learned the danger level associated with a predator prior to hatching and generalized their learned recognition to other similar predators with which the woodfrogs lacked experience. Embryos exposed to salamander odor (SO) paired with injured tadpole cues learned to recognize the salamander Ambystoma tigrinum, but those exposed to SO paired with well water did not. When we increased the concentration of alarm cues to which embryos were exposed, tadpoles showed stronger response to salamander cues. In addition, the tadpoles generalize their learned response to the odor of closely related newts Cynops pyrrhogaster but not Xenopus frogs. In accordance with the Predator Recognition Continuum Hypothesis, the ability to generalize was dependent on the threat level of the predator. Our results highlight the sophistication of learned responses to predators by embryonic amphibians and stress the need for studies in other taxa. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Maud C.O. Ferrari & Douglas P. Chivers, 2009. "Sophisticated early life lessons: threat-sensitive generalization of predator recognition by embryonic amphibians," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(6), pages 1295-1298.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1295-1298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp135
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:6:p:1295-1298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.