IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i5p930-935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Food limitation increases aggression in juvenile meerkats

Author

Listed:
  • S.J. Hodge
  • A. Thornton
  • T.P. Flower
  • T.H. Clutton-Brock

Abstract

Both the rate and severity of sibling aggression are predicted to be higher when food availability is low. Although there is now good evidence that food availability influences sibling aggression in facultatively siblicidal species, where aggression commonly results in the death of a competitor, little is known about the proximate causes of aggression in nonsiblicidal species, where aggression rarely results in serious injury. Here, we investigated patterns of aggression between juvenile meerkats (Suricata suricatta), a species where littermate aggression is common, but never lethal. We show that the frequency of aggression between littermates increased when rainfall and helper number, both predictors of the amount of food available to pups, were low. Short-term feeding experiments demonstrated that reducing pup hunger by provisioning them before a foraging session significantly reduced their frequency of aggression in comparison to unfed controls. There was no evidence that offspring sex or weight influenced either the rate at which pups were aggressive, or which littermates they were aggressive to. These results suggest that food availability is an important factor affecting the severity of aggressive competition between offspring, even in the absence of lethal aggressive attacks. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • S.J. Hodge & A. Thornton & T.P. Flower & T.H. Clutton-Brock, 2009. "Food limitation increases aggression in juvenile meerkats," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(5), pages 930-935.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:930-935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp071
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:5:p:930-935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.