IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i4p781-788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A behavioral syndrome linking courtship behavior toward males and females predicts reproductive success from a single mating in the hissing cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa

Author

Listed:
  • David M. Logue
  • Sandeep Mishra
  • David McCaffrey
  • Deborah Ball
  • William H. Cade

Abstract

Suites of correlated behaviors, or "behavioral syndromes," have been shown to occur throughout the animal kingdom. Behavioral syndromes involving sexual selection are expected to have significant evolutionary ramifications, but few studies have linked behavioral syndromes to sexual selection. We measured the behavior of male hissing cockroaches (Gromphadorhina portentosa) during male--male competition, female choice, and 3 other ecologically relevant contexts and quantified between-context correlations in behavior. We found that aggression directed toward an opponent and retreat and courtship elicited from an opponent were repeatable among males, suggesting that individuals exhibit stable behavioral types in the context of male--male interaction. Our analyses also revealed a "fast--slow" syndrome, linking behavior in a self-righting context to behavior in a foraging context. In contrast to data from several other species, fast--slow scores in hissing cockroaches were not correlated with aggression in a male--male context. Finally, we identified a new type of behavioral syndrome, which we call "libido." Libido was defined by a positive relationship between courtship directed toward opponents in a male--male context and courtship directed toward potential mating partners in a male--female context. Among males that copulated, libido scores predicted reproductive success. We conclude that the libido syndrome, coupled with sexual selection favoring high courtship intensity in a male--female context, may be responsible for the persistence of male--male courtship behavior in this population. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • David M. Logue & Sandeep Mishra & David McCaffrey & Deborah Ball & William H. Cade, 2009. "A behavioral syndrome linking courtship behavior toward males and females predicts reproductive success from a single mating in the hissing cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 781-788.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:781-788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alison Bell, 2013. "Randomized or fixed order for studies of behavioral syndromes?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 16-20.
    2. Puya Abbassi & Nancy Tyler Burley, 2012. "Nice guys finish last: same-sex sexual behavior and pairing success in male budgerigars," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 775-782.
    3. Bruce E Kendall & Gordon A Fox & Joseph P Stover & Shinichi NakagawaHandling editor, 2018. "Boldness-aggression syndromes can reduce population density: behavior and demographic heterogeneity," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 31-41.
    4. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Gábor Markó & Gábor Herczeg, 2013. "A meta-analysis of correlated behaviors with implications for behavioral syndromes: relationships between particular behavioral traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1068-1080.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:781-788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.