IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i4p729-735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal weight, offspring competitive ability, and the evolution of communal breeding

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah J. Hodge
  • Matthew B.V. Bell
  • Francis Mwanguhya
  • Solomon Kyabulima
  • Ruth C. Waldick
  • Andy F. Russell

Abstract

Despite the widespread occurrence of communal breeding in animal societies, the fitness consequences for mothers are poorly understood. One factor that may have an important influence on the net benefits mothers gain from breeding communally is the competitive ability of their offspring, as mothers are likely to gain substantial advantages from producing young who can outcompete the offspring of other females for access to resources. Here, we investigate the factors that influence offspring competition in the communally breeding banded mongoose (Mungos mungo). We show that heavy offspring are more likely to win competitive interactions with their littermates. Heavy offspring also receive more care and are more likely to survive to independence in large communal litters where competition is most intense. Our results also indicate that offspring weight at emergence is positively correlated with the weight of the mother at conception. As a consequence, the offspring of heavy mothers are likely to enjoy marked competitive advantages during early life. Together, our findings strongly suggest that the competitive ability of offspring will influence the costs and benefits that females experience while breeding communally and highlights the need for closer examination of the factors that influence offspring competitive ability and the influence this may have on the evolution of communal breeding. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah J. Hodge & Matthew B.V. Bell & Francis Mwanguhya & Solomon Kyabulima & Ruth C. Waldick & Andy F. Russell, 2009. "Maternal weight, offspring competitive ability, and the evolution of communal breeding," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(4), pages 729-735.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:729-735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hazel J. Nichols & Michael A. Cant & Jennifer L. Sanderson, 2015. "Adjustment of costly extra-group paternity according to inbreeding risk in a cooperative mammal," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(6), pages 1486-1494.
    2. H. J. Nichols & M. B. V. Bell & S. J. Hodge & M. A. Cant, 2012. "Resource limitation moderates the adaptive suppression of subordinate breeding in a cooperatively breeding mongoose," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 635-642.
    3. Kat Bebbington & Eleanor A Fairfield & Lewis G Spurgin & Sjouke A Kingma & Hannah Dugdale & Jan Komdeur & David S Richardson & Anna LindholmHandling editor, 2018. "Joint care can outweigh costs of nonkin competition in communal breeders," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 29(1), pages 169-178.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:4:p:729-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.