IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i3p570-574.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How important is sex for females of a haplodiploid species under local mate competition?

Author

Listed:
  • Sven Steiner
  • Joachim Ruther

Abstract

Virgin females of Hymenoptera are still able to reproduce by laying unfertilized eggs that develop into male offspring (arrhenotokous haplodiploidy). Therefore, these constrained females may face a conflict between searching hosts and obtaining immediate fitness or investing time and energy in finding a mate enabling them to produce offspring of either sex. We studied this conflict in Nasonia vitripennis Walker (Pteromalidae), a pupal parasitoid of numerous fly species, by investigating olfactory preferences of constrained females for the male sex pheromone and host odor, respectively. According to Godfray's constrained model, females of haplodiploid species gain only little advantage from mating when population sex ratio is at equilibrium. However, in species with local mate competition like N. vitripennis, females are predicted to invest comparatively more time and energy in mating activities. In behavioral 2-choice experiments, virgin females were innately attracted to both male pheromone deposits and the odor of host puparia. When given the choice between these 2 stimuli, virgin females preferred the pheromone even when they were allowed to associate host odor with oviposition success prior to the bioassay. Immediately after mating, however, the olfactory preference of females switched to host odor. We conclude that constrained females of N. vitripennis are much more motivated to invest in mate finding than in host finding as predicted by the constrained model. The results are discussed with respect to the ecology of N. vitripennis. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Sven Steiner & Joachim Ruther, 2009. "How important is sex for females of a haplodiploid species under local mate competition?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(3), pages 570-574.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:570-574
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arp033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:3:p:570-574. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.