IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v20y2009i2p426-432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Livestock grazing behavior and inter- versus intraspecific disease risk via the fecal--oral route

Author

Listed:
  • Lesley A. Smith
  • Piran C.L. White
  • Glenn Marion
  • Michael R. Hutchings

Abstract

Livestock herbivores are at risk of parasite/pathogen exposure from livestock and wild mammal feces during grazing. Livestock exposure to parasites/pathogens will be dependent on the behavioral contact processes between grazing livestock and host animal (both livestock and wild mammal) feces at the bite scale. Here we use 2 grazing experiments to determine the affect of feces from different species and in different defecation patterns on the grazing response of cattle. In experiment 1, there were 4 plots, each with 4 replicates of 5 patch treatments of different fecal contamination (240 g/m-super-2 of Eurasian badger feces, cattle feces, fallow deer feces, Eurasian rabbit feces, and noncontaminated control patches). In experiment 2, there were 3 treatment patterns of badger fecal contamination (one 1-m-super-2 circular patch contaminated with 960 g of badger feces; two 1-m-super-2 circular patches each contaminated with 480 g of badger feces; and four 1-m-super-2 circular patches each contaminated with 240 g of badger feces), divided into 2 plots per treatment. The cattle's grazing response was determined by measuring sward depletion at each of the treatment patches. In experiment 1, cattle-grazed control and rabbit fecal--contaminated patches the most, whereas badger-contaminated patches were grazed the least. In experiment 2, cattle grazed the treatment with the greatest number of fecal-contaminated patches the most. We conclude that cattle vary their grazing response to feces from different host species and to feces in different spatial patterns. Quantifying these behavioral responses to feces is a key step toward quantifying infection risk to herbivores via the fecal--oral route in grazing systems. Copyright 2009, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lesley A. Smith & Piran C.L. White & Glenn Marion & Michael R. Hutchings, 2009. "Livestock grazing behavior and inter- versus intraspecific disease risk via the fecal--oral route," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 20(2), pages 426-432.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:2:p:426-432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn143
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pritchard, Alexander J. & Fefferman, Nina H., 2023. "Trade-offs in resource access and health by avoidance of self-fouling, motivated via disgust," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:20:y:2009:i:2:p:426-432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.