IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i5p1006-1011.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of sex and sociality on parasite loads in an African ground squirrel

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa A. Hillegass
  • Jane M. Waterman
  • James D. Roth

Abstract

Male-biased parasite loads, which are common in vertebrates, could be a consequence of sexual selection, and for species that group, the costs of parasites could vary with group size or social structure. We examined sex-biased parasitism and the influence of group size on parasite loads in Cape ground squirrels (Xerus inauris), a highly social species that occurs in the arid regions of southern Africa. Group size did not affect numbers of ectoparasites or endoparasites. Males carried 3 times as many ectoparasites as females, but females harbored nearly 3 times as many endoparasites as males. Age class did not affect parasite loads in females, but in males, adults carried more ectoparasites than juveniles. Allogrooming was performed primarily by females, but no sex difference was found in autogrooming. Males in the subadult age class are becoming scrotal (indicating an increase in sex hormones) but typically remain in the natal group until adulthood, maintaining home range sizes comparable to adult females. Our results suggest that sexual selection does influence parasite loads in this species; increased androgen levels may reduce ectoparasite resistance in males, and smaller home ranges may increase females' exposure to endoparasites. Allogrooming could reduce ectoparasite loads of the group and mitigate the costs of grouping. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa A. Hillegass & Jane M. Waterman & James D. Roth, 2008. "The influence of sex and sociality on parasite loads in an African ground squirrel," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(5), pages 1006-1011.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:1006-1011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:5:p:1006-1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.