IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i3p621-626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of perceived mortality risk on habitat selection in a terrestrial salamander

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre M. Roberts
  • Eric B. Liebgold

Abstract

Animals select microhabitats based on food availability, physiological cost, and mortality risk relative to other available habitats. The best habitat selection models take into account a trade-off between predation risk and foraging success. We investigated the effect of simulated predation on microhabitat use in light of differences in prey availability in Plethodon cinereus, a small terrestrial salamander which displays nighttime plant-climbing behavior. We tested the hypothesis that plant climbing is a predator avoidance behavior in P. cinereus by causing autotomization of salamanders' tails to simulate attempted predation and subsequently tracking them with fluorescent powder. We found that, on average, simulated predation increased the maximum height climbed. To ensure that salamanders were not climbing to access greater numbers of prey, we measured prey abundance on and above the ground and found more prey on the ground than on plants. Finally, we conducted observations of unmanipulated individuals of P. cinereus and found that weather variables affected the height climbed and males climbed higher than females, perhaps due to lower energetic costs in males. We conclude that salamanders use the plant habitat as a refuge from predation despite reduced foraging potential and increased physiological cost. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre M. Roberts & Eric B. Liebgold, 2008. "The effects of perceived mortality risk on habitat selection in a terrestrial salamander," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(3), pages 621-626.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:621-626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arn012
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:3:p:621-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.