IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v19y2008i2p369-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ultraviolet reflectance of plumage for parent--offspring communication in the great tit (Parus major)

Author

Listed:
  • Marion Tanner
  • Heinz Richner

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) reflectance has been implicated in mate selection. Yet, in some bird species the plumage of young varies in UV reflectance already in the nest and long before mate choice and sexual selection come into play. Most birds molt the juvenile body plumage before reaching sexual maturity, and thus, some conspicuous traits of the juvenile body plumage may rather have evolved by natural selection, possibly via predation or parental preference. This second hypothesis is largely untested and predicts a differential allocation of food between fledging and total independence, which is a time period of 2--3 weeks where offspring mortality is also highest. Here, we test the prediction that parents use the individual variation in UV reflectance among fledglings for differential food allocation. We manipulated UV reflectance of the plumage of fledgling great tits Parus major by treating chest and cheek feathers with a lotion that either did or did not contain UV blockers and then recorded food allocation by parents in an outdoor design simulating postfledging conditions. The visible spectrum was minimally affected by this treatment. Females were found to feed UV-reflecting offspring preferentially, whereas males had no preference. It is the first evidence showing that the UV reflectance of the feathers of young birds has a signaling function in parent--offspring communication and suggests that the UV traits evolved via parental preference. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Marion Tanner & Heinz Richner, 2008. "Ultraviolet reflectance of plumage for parent--offspring communication in the great tit (Parus major)," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 19(2), pages 369-373.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:369-373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm142
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:19:y:2008:i:2:p:369-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.