IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i6p1123-1131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock

Author

Listed:
  • Adeline Loyau
  • Doris Gomez
  • Benoit Moureau
  • Marc Théry
  • Nathan S. Hart
  • Michel Saint Jalme
  • Andrew T.D. Bennett
  • Gabriele Sorci

Abstract

Gaudy plumage coloration is a widespread ornamental trait in birds and thought to be sexually selected. Although much attention has been devoted to structural coloration reflecting in UV, the signaling function of structural colors lacking UV reflectance and those that exhibit iridescence coloration are poorly documented. The train of the peacock (Pavo cristatus), a classical example of a sexually selected trait, is composed of iridescent structurally colored eyespots not reflecting in UV. Until today, the role played by the structural color of the eyespots in female mate choice has never been investigated using spectrometry. We measured eyespot coloration from a stationary angle (static coloration) and the change in coloration resulting from different angles (iridescent coloration). We assessed coloration with reflectance spectrometry, and we analyzed reflectance spectra using 2 methods. First, we extracted the reflectance spectra shape descriptors hue, brightness, and chroma. Second, we computed color and brightness contrasts signaled by eyespot feathers, taking peafowl color visual sensitivity into account. Iridescence was estimated by the maximal change for all parameters. Brightness was correlated with male mating success. The maximal change in color contrast was correlated with both the frequency of male visitation by females and male mating success. These results suggest that peahens can use both static and dynamic (i.e., iridescent) aspects of plumage structural coloration as signals to detect and choose their mates. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Adeline Loyau & Doris Gomez & Benoit Moureau & Marc Théry & Nathan S. Hart & Michel Saint Jalme & Andrew T.D. Bennett & Gabriele Sorci, 2007. "Iridescent structurally based coloration of eyespots correlates with mating success in the peacock," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 1123-1131.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:6:p:1123-1131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Darrell J. Kemp & Marie E. Herberstein & Gregory F. Grether, 2012. "Unraveling the true complexity of costly color signaling," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(2), pages 233-236.
    2. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2013. "Editor's choice Eye for an eyespot: how iridescent plumage ocelli influence peacock mating success," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(5), pages 1048-1057.
    3. Roslyn Dakin & Robert Montgomerie, 2014. "Condition-dependent mate assessment and choice by peahens: implications for sexual selection," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(5), pages 1097-1104.
    4. Thomas W. Pike, 2012. "Preserving perceptual distances in chromaticity diagrams," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(4), pages 723-728.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:6:p:1123-1131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.