IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v18y2007i6p1092-1099.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The honeybee queen influences the regulation of colony drone production

Author

Listed:
  • Katie E. Wharton
  • Fred C. Dyer
  • Zachary Y. Huang
  • Thomas Getty

Abstract

Social insect colonies invest in reproduction and growth, but how colonies achieve an adaptive allocation to these life-history characters remains an open question in social insect biology. Attempts to understand how a colony's investment in reproduction is shaped by the queen and the workers have proved complicated because of the potential for queen--worker conflict over the colony's investment in males versus females. Honeybees, in which this conflict is expected to be minimal or absent, provide an opportunity to more clearly study how the actions and interactions of individuals influence the colony's production and regulation of males (drones). We examined whether honeybee queens can influence drone regulation by either allowing or preventing them from laying drone eggs for a period of time and then examining their subsequent tendency to lay drone and worker eggs. Queens who initially laid drone eggs subsequently laid fewer drone eggs than the queens who were initially prevented from producing drone eggs. This indicates that a colony's regulation of drones may be achieved not only by the workers, who build wax cells for drones and feed the larvae, but also by the queen, who can modify her production of drone eggs. In order to better understand how the queen and workers contribute to social insect colony decisions, future work should attempt to distinguish between actions that reflect conflict over sex allocation and those that reflect cooperation and shared control over the colony's investment in reproduction. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Katie E. Wharton & Fred C. Dyer & Zachary Y. Huang & Thomas Getty, 2007. "The honeybee queen influences the regulation of colony drone production," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(6), pages 1092-1099.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:6:p:1092-1099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arm086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:18:y:2007:i:6:p:1092-1099. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.