IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v17y2006i6p873-880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Colony genetic structure in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Bolton
  • Seirian Sumner
  • Gavin Shreeves
  • Maurizio Casiraghi
  • Jeremy Field

Abstract

The degree of genetic heterogeneity among the individuals in an animal society depends on the society's genetic structure. Genetic heterogeneity, in turn, means that group members will differ in their reproductive objectives and conflicts over reproduction may arise. The resolution of these conflicts may be reflected in the way that reproduction is partitioned between potential reproductives. We used 5 microsatellite loci to investigate genetic structure and reproductive skew in 17 nests of the Malaysian hover wasp, Parischnogaster alternata. Parischnogaster alternata colonies are small (1--10 females), and all adult colony members are capable of mating and producing offspring. We found that colonies tended to consist of closely related individuals and that at any one time the production of both female and male offspring was nearly always monopolized by a single dominant female, despite considerable variation between nests in parameters predicted to affect skew. Subordinate females that remained in their natal colonies obtained indirect fitness benefits by helping to raise offspring to which they were related. Subordinate females also appeared to be positioned within an age-based queue for inheritance of the dominant egg-laying position. We suggest that the high skew in P. alternata may result from strong ecological constraints on solitary nesting, high relatedness, and a relatively high probability that subordinates will eventually inherit the position of dominance. Copyright 2006.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Bolton & Seirian Sumner & Gavin Shreeves & Maurizio Casiraghi & Jeremy Field, 2006. "Colony genetic structure in a facultatively eusocial hover wasp," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 17(6), pages 873-880, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:873-880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arl020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:17:y:2006:i:6:p:873-880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.