IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i5p889-897.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative influence of male and female genital morphology on paternity in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus

Author

Listed:
  • Clarissa M. House
  • Leigh W. Simmons

Abstract

Studies of fertilization success have demonstrated that male effects are often a strong and important source of variation in P-sub-2 (the proportion of offspring that are fertilized by the second male to mate). More recently there has been emphasis on female processes that occur during and after copulation that might bias the outcome of male-male interactions. Here we used the sterile male technique to evaluate whether female genital morphology influences the repeatability of P-sub-2 when the same pair of male dung beetles, Onthophagus taurus, copulated with a series of full-sib females or unrelated females that were all unrelated to the male pair. Repeatability estimates of measures of female genital morphology showed that full-sib females varied less in their genital morphology than did unrelated females. Therefore, if female genital traits are an important source of variation in male fertilization success, P-sub-2 should be more repeatable across full-sib than unrelated females. Contrary to this prediction, we show that the repeatability of P-sub-2 did not differ between female groups. Moreover, specific dimensions of the female genitalia (sclerotized vagina and bursa) did not contribute significantly to variance in P-sub-2. In contrast, male effects had consistent and repeatable influences on paternity across females. These were partly explained by variation in the morphology of male genital sclerites. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Clarissa M. House & Leigh W. Simmons, 2005. "Relative influence of male and female genital morphology on paternity in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(5), pages 889-897, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:5:p:889-897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari066
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:5:p:889-897. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.