IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v16y2005i3p606-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maternal rank is not correlated with cub survival in the spotted hyena, Crocuta crocuta

Author

Listed:
  • Paula A. White

Abstract

Reproductive success in female spotted hyenas, Crocuta crocuta, is positively correlated with social rank. High-ranking females are known to produce more offspring, but the effects of maternal rank on early cub survivorship have not been investigated. Cub mortality was examined over a 4-year period in one clan of wild-living spotted hyenas in Kenya. Data were obtained for 100 cubs in 63 litters produced by 27 adult females. Survivorship of cubs from birth through their first year was examined as a function of litter size, sex of cubs, and maternal rank. Overall, cub mortality was high (61%). Contrary to expectation, singleton cubs did not survive better than twins, and there was no difference in survivorship between female and male cubs. High-ranking mothers were not more successful at raising twins or daughters than were low-ranking mothers. There was no correlation between cub mortality and maternal rank. Peaks in cub mortality coincided with life stage events, including mean age of arrival at a communal den, and age at which cubs began visiting kills. Documented causes of mortality included intraclan infanticide, disease, orphaning, predation by lions, and a mechanism of filial infanticide that has not been previously described in this species: selective litter reduction by mothers via partial litter abandonment. No instances of facultative or obligate siblicide were detected. During this study, association between rank and number of cubs surviving to 1 year of age appeared to be due to differences in reproductive output and not differential survival of cubs within their first year. Copyright 2005.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula A. White, 2005. "Maternal rank is not correlated with cub survival in the spotted hyena, Crocuta crocuta," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 16(3), pages 606-613, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:606-613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/ari033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:16:y:2005:i:3:p:606-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.