IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i6p1016-1022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nocturnal anti-predator adaptations in eared and earless Nearctic Lepidoptera

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda R. Soutar
  • James H. Fullard

Abstract

Nocturnal flight exposes insects to selection pressures that include reduced light and the hunting behavior of insectivorous bats. Using a phylogenetically based selection of wild moths collected from a Nearctic site, we report that earless species fly less throughout the night than eared species. This supports the hypothesis that this behavior has evolved as a passive defense against the transient attacks of aerially foraging bats in insects that do not possess long-range auditory detection abilities. We measured the eyesize of a selection of moths whose 24-h flight activities are known and confirm that nocturnal lifestyle results in larger eyes. With the exception of hawkmoths, there is no eyesize difference between eared and earless moths, suggesting that earless moths do not preferentially use vision to detect the approach of bats. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda R. Soutar & James H. Fullard, 2004. "Nocturnal anti-predator adaptations in eared and earless Nearctic Lepidoptera," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(6), pages 1016-1022, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:1016-1022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:6:p:1016-1022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.