IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i5p816-823.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nest-site preference and maternal effects on offspring growth

Author

Listed:
  • John D. Lloyd
  • Thomas E. Martin

Abstract

Maternal preferences for oviposition sites are assumed to be adaptive, but offspring fitness is not always higher at preferred sites and, thus, further study of the selection pressures that influence oviposition behavior is warranted. Among birds, predation is regarded as the primary agent of selection on nest-site microhabitat preferences, but alternatives are rarely considered. We tested the hypothesis that avian nest-site preferences are an adaptive response to fitness costs imposed by variation in nest-site microclimate. We documented that Chestnut-collared Longspurs (Calcarius ornatus) strongly preferred to orient nests towards the southeast and showed that this preference influenced microclimate: nests facing southeast had the highest midday temperatures. Yet, preferences were not adaptive because nestlings in nests with the preferred orientation gained mass at a slower rate, had retarded skeletal growth, and reached a smaller final size. We experimentally tested this result by altering orientation of nests and confirmed, for the first time, that variation in nestling growth was causally linked to variation in nest microclimate arising from nest-orientation preferences. Adults responded to the high temperatures at preferred southeast-facing nests by spending more time shading young from the sun, apparently attempting to ameliorate heat costs. This response, however, resulted in parents spending less time feeding young, potentially explaining slower growth in these nests. Direct effects of higher temperatures may also play a role in slower growth. Although we lack an explanation for this apparently maladaptive preference, these results demonstrate that nest-site choices of birds can yield fitness costs imposed by variation in nest microclimate. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • John D. Lloyd & Thomas E. Martin, 2004. "Nest-site preference and maternal effects on offspring growth," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(5), pages 816-823, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:816-823
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marta Giordano & Ton G. G. Groothuis & Barbara Tschirren, 2014. "Interactions between prenatal maternal effects and posthatching conditions in a wild bird population," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(6), pages 1459-1466.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:5:p:816-823. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.