IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i2p233-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A test of the importance of direct and indirect fitness benefits for helping decisions in western bluebirds

Author

Listed:
  • Janis L. Dickinson

Abstract

In cooperative breeders, the extent to which helpers at the nest adjust their contributions in accordance with direct and indirect (kin-selected) fitness payoffs remains an open question. In a long-term study of the western bluebird, Sialia mexicana, helpers were exclusively male and helped at nests of both parents, a parent and stepparent, or a brother and unrelated female. This natural variation in the context of helping facilitated comparison of observational data on groups in which one type of fitness benefit (current direct, future direct, or indirect) varied, whereas the other two were constant. Helpers reduced their share of provisioning as they got older, so comparisons were restricted to groups with yearling helpers. When potential direct fitness benefits were identical, but relatedness was reduced by half owing to the presence of a stepparent, yearling helpers failed to reduce their share of feeding trips to the nest. The potential for future direct fitness benefits via possible mate and territory inheritance was low, and did not influence the helper's share of provisioning in a comparison of groups with similar relatedness and opportunities for current direct fitness benefits. Even though cobreeding to gain current direct fitness benefits was infrequent (17% of nests with brother-helpers), it was associated with an increase in the helper's share of provisioning, suggesting that a helper's feeding allocation responds positively to increased opportunity for parentage in the nest. The current study demonstrates a useful framework for separating direct and indirect benefits with respect to helping decisions, and indicates that western bluebird helpers adjust their feeding rates in response to the potential for direct fitness benefits in the current nest, not indirect benefits or future direct fitness payoffs. Although past studies of this population showed that indirect benefits play a role in whether or not helpers help, the current study indicates that they do not play a role in how frequently helpers feed at the nest. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Janis L. Dickinson, 2004. "A test of the importance of direct and indirect fitness benefits for helping decisions in western bluebirds," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(2), pages 233-238, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:233-238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arh001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:2:p:233-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.