IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v15y2004i1p169-173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Immunocompetence and resource holding potential in the damselfly, Calopteryx virgo L

Author

Listed:
  • Jani Koskimäki
  • Markus J. Rantala
  • Jouni Taskinen
  • Katja Tynkkynen
  • Jukka Suhonen

Abstract

It is generally believed that resource holding potential reliably reflects male quality, but empirical evidence showing this is scarce. Here we show that the outcome of male-male competition may predict male immunocompetence in the territorial damselfly, Calopteryx virgo (Odonata: Calopterygidae). We staged contests between 27 pairs of males and found that winners of the contests showed higher immunocompetence, measured as encapsulation response, compared with that of losers. Furthermore, the winners had larger fat reserves. We also collected 29 males that had not been used in staged contests, and found that in these males encapsulation response correlated positively with an individual's fat reserves. Both immunocompetence and resource holding potential seem to depend on energy reserves, suggesting a trade-off between parasite resistance and energetically costly territorial behavior. The results suggest that the outcome of male-male contest can be used to predict male quality in terms of immune defense. Copyright 2004.

Suggested Citation

  • Jani Koskimäki & Markus J. Rantala & Jouni Taskinen & Katja Tynkkynen & Jukka Suhonen, 2004. "Immunocompetence and resource holding potential in the damselfly, Calopteryx virgo L," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 15(1), pages 169-173, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:1:p:169-173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:15:y:2004:i:1:p:169-173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.