IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i4p546-553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advantages and disadvantages of large colony size in a halictid bee: the queen's perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Erhard Strohm
  • Anita Bordon-Hauser

Abstract

The size of the group of social species might influence basic aspects of productivity and social interactions. In many primitively social insects, foundress queens are basically in control of the number of workers in their first brood. We examined factors that might influence the optimal number of workers a queen should produce during the solitary founding phase in Lasioglossum malachurum (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). A priori, it seems plausible that she should produce as many workers as possible (1) to maximize colony productivity and (2) to minimize the impact of brood parasitoids. However, there might also be unfavorable consequences of a large colony size from the queen's perspective. First, the queen might incur disproportionately high costs that decrease her potential for subsequent reproduction. Second, the queen might not be able to suppress the development of ovaries in a large number of workers. As a clear advantage of a large colony size, we found an increased production of sexuals. Contrary to our expectation, in the first worker phase, nests that were parasitized by Sphecodes bees had more workers than did unparasitized nests. We found no evidence that the production of the first worker brood entailed costs to the queen. However, the degree of development of worker ovaries increased with colony size, and some degree of development was detectable with as few as four workers. This study shows that the number of workers a queen produces might depend on the interaction of several factors, some of which have not been considered in detail yet. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Erhard Strohm & Anita Bordon-Hauser, 2003. "Advantages and disadvantages of large colony size in a halictid bee: the queen's perspective," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 546-553, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:546-553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg039
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:546-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.