IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i4p510-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefits of foundress associations in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: increased productivity and survival, but no assurance of fitness returns

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth A. Tibbetts
  • Hudson Kern Reeve

Abstract

Successful Polistes dominulus nests can be started by one or more nest founding queens (foundresses). Consequently, there is much interest in the specific benefits that induce cooperation among foundresses. Here, we experimentally demonstrate one major benefit of cooperation, namely that multiple foundresses increase colony productivity. This increase is close to the value predicted by subtracting the productivity of undisturbed single-foundress colonies from the productivity of undisturbed multiple-foundress colonies. However, we found no evidence that an associating foundress' contribution to colony growth is preserved if she disappears (assured fitness returns). Our correlational data suggest that cooperation provides survival benefits, multiple-foundress colonies are more likely to survive to produce offspring than are single-foundress colonies, and individual foundresses in multiple-foundress groups are less likely to disappear before worker emergence than foundresses nesting alone. Therefore, association provides substantial productivity and survival benefits for cooperating foundresses. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth A. Tibbetts & Hudson Kern Reeve, 2003. "Benefits of foundress associations in the paper wasp Polistes dominulus: increased productivity and survival, but no assurance of fitness returns," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(4), pages 510-514, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:510-514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arg037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:4:p:510-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.