IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v14y2003i3p409-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Correlated evolution of herbivory and food chemical discrimination in iguanian and ambush foraging lizards

Author

Listed:
  • William E. Cooper

Abstract

To efficiently locate and assess foods, animal sensory capacities and behavioral discriminations based on them must be appropriate for the diet and method of hunting. In lizards, actively foraging insectivores identify animal prey using lingually sampled chemical cues, but ambush foragers do not. Among plant eaters derived from active foragers, plant chemical discrimination is added to prey chemical discrimination, resulting in correlated evolution of plant diet and plant chemical discrimination. Here I present comparative evidence on the relationships between plant diet and food chemical discrimination in Iguania, which consists primarily of ambush foragers and is one of two major lizard clades, and for ambushing lizards in general. Comparative analyses conducted using phylogenetic methods show that (1) all but one species of omnivore studied exhibited both prey and plant chemical discrimination, whereas ambush foragers exhibited neither; (2) significant correlated evolution occurred between plant diet and plant chemical discrimination in Iguania and in omnivores and herbivores derived from ambush foragers; and (3) correlated evolution has occurred between prey and plant chemical discrimination in Iguania and, more generally, in taxa derived from ambush foragers. These results are explained by selection on plant eaters to assess the nutritional value and possible toxicity of plants and by continued consumption of some animal prey even in herbivores combined with freedom from factors that select against prey chemical discrimination in ambush foragers. Copyright 2003.

Suggested Citation

  • William E. Cooper, 2003. "Correlated evolution of herbivory and food chemical discrimination in iguanian and ambush foraging lizards," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 14(3), pages 409-416, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:3:p:409-416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:14:y:2003:i:3:p:409-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.