IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v13y2002i5p637-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female begging in European robins: do neighbors eavesdrop for extrapair copulations?

Author

Listed:
  • Joe A. Tobias
  • Nathalie Seddon

Abstract

Female European robins beg for food from their mates throughout the breeding season using far-carrying "seep" calls which resemble the begging calls of fledglings. We investigated the possibility that these calls are eavesdropped by neighboring males and used as cues to target intrusions during the fertile period. Female seep calling and male courtship feeding peaked in the fertile period, and males appeared to modify provisioning rate in relation to seep calling rate. Further, there was a positive correlation between rate of courtship feeding and clutch size, both of which tended to be inversely related to seep calling rates. These observations imply that the seep call is a hunger signal directed at pair males. As the signal is loud and given most frequently during the fertile period, it must also contain information about fertility and location. Playback experiments suggested that this information is eavesdropped by neighboring males, who responded to rapid rates of seep calling more readily than slow rates and to calls broadcast at the edge of territories rather than their center, presumably in search of extrapair copulations. Pair males can reduce the intensity of the female's signal by courtship feeding, and thus male provisioning may protect paternity. Copyright 2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe A. Tobias & Nathalie Seddon, 2002. "Female begging in European robins: do neighbors eavesdrop for extrapair copulations?," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 13(5), pages 637-642, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:637-642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:13:y:2002:i:5:p:637-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.