IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/amlawe/v24y2022i1p278-326..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coalitions among Plaintiffs’ Attorneys in Securities Class Actions
[Repeat Players in Multidistrict Litigation: The Social Network]

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen J Choi
  • Jessica Erickson
  • Adam C Pritchard

Abstract

This article examines contests among plaintiffs’ law firms to become lead counsel in securities fraud class actions. We study lead counsel appointments in all federal securities class actions from 2005 to 2016. Although the typical class action has several lead plaintiff motions, many of these motions will either withdraw or combine before the judge chooses the lead plaintiff and lead counsel. We find that law firms’ decisions to combine correspond primarily with the existence of relationships between law firms rather than case characteristics. When motions combine, the number of selected lead counsel typically increases. We also find that the correspondence of prior relationships between law firms on decisions to withdraw or combine does not increase with our proxies for the importance of synergies between law firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen J Choi & Jessica Erickson & Adam C Pritchard, 2022. "Coalitions among Plaintiffs’ Attorneys in Securities Class Actions [Repeat Players in Multidistrict Litigation: The Social Network]," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 278-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:278-326.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/aler/ahac003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    K22; K41;

    JEL classification:

    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law
    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:amlawe:v:24:y:2022:i:1:p:278-326.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/aler .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.