IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v88y2006i4p1000-1014.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anti-Corporate Farming Laws and Industry Structure: The Case of Cattle Feeding

Author

Listed:
  • Azzeddine M. Azzam
  • J. David Aiken

Abstract

Nine midwestern states have laws that restrict the involvement of publicly held corporations in agriculture. Opponents argue that the laws' direct efforts to regulate ownership structure may have an adverse indirect impact on size structure. Restricting corporate involvement might stifle the emergence and growth of efficient, large-scale establishments if corporations have advantages over other organizational forms in meeting capital requirements. Since 1982, Nebraska has had an anti-corporate farming law that prohibits corporate ownership of feedlots. We test whether the implementation of the Nebraska law had an impact on the stochastic process governing the evolution of the state's feedlot size distribution. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Azzeddine M. Azzam & J. David Aiken, 2006. "Anti-Corporate Farming Laws and Industry Structure: The Case of Cattle Feeding," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(4), pages 1000-1014.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:88:y:2006:i:4:p:1000-1014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00912.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Batie, Cicely M. & Dennis, Elliott J. & Lubben, Bradley D., 2020. "Do state-level agricultural promotion programs increase agricultural output? The case of the Livestock Friendly County designation program in Nebraska," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304399, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Ostapchuk, Igor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Curtiss, Jarmila, 2021. "Post-acquisition integration and growth of farms: the case of Ukrainian agroholdings," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(4), April.
    3. Jürgen Wandel, 2011. "Business groups and competition in post-Soviet transition economies: The case of Russian “agroholdings”," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(4), pages 403-450, December.
    4. Wandel, Jürgen, 2011. "Integrierte Strukturen im Agrar- und Ernährungssektor Russlands: Entstehungsgründe, Funktionsweise, Entwicklungsperspektiven und volkswirtschaftliche Auswirkungen. Band I und II," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 63, number 63.
    5. Keller, Andrew J. & Boland, Michael A. & Petty, Scott A., 2022. "The Growing Use of Alternative Farmland Ownership Methods in the U.S," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2022.
    6. Lee, Hanbin & Sexton, Richard J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2022. "Government Restrictions on Food Available to Consumers: Economics of Regulations that Limit Farming Practices for Products Sold within Jurisdictions, with Application to California’s 2022 Pork Rules," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322438, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:88:y:2006:i:4:p:1000-1014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.